Prediction of Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Marlot Meddens Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. Groenefeld vs M. Meddens

Anna-Lena Groenefeld

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.80m

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

293

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$836.3K

Career Money

$1.7K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Marlot Meddens

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

1.80m

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

293

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$836.3K

Career Money

$1.7K

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Head-to-head: Groenefeld 1 - 0 Meddens

They have played 2 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Groenefeld winning 2 and Marlot Meddens winning 0. The last match between Anna-Lena Groenefeld and Marlot Meddens was at the Alkmaar, 16-06-2008, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Anna-Lena Groenefeld getting the victory 6-1 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Groenefeld	1
Meddens	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(F) Alkmaar(06-16-08)

Stats

Anna-Lena Groenefeld

Marlot Meddens

A. Groenefeld vs M. Meddens H2H Profile

A. Groenefeld	Stats	M. Meddens
$836,300	Career Prize Money	$1,720
56.78% (268-204)	Career Total W/L	63.01% (92-54)
1	Clay	0
11	Titles	5
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

A. Groenefeld vs M. Meddens Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Anna-Lena Groenefeld has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Marlot Meddens has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Anna-Lena Groenefeld, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marlot Meddens has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Anna-Lena Groenefeld has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marlot Meddens has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Anna-Lena Groenefeld has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Marlot Meddens winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Anna-Lena Groenefeld has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 128/67), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 3/12). Marlot Meddens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 6/3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/3).
Player level: In the last year, Anna-Lena Groenefeld has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Marlot Meddens has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Anna-Lena Groenefeld winning 1 times and Marlot Meddens being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Anna-Lena Groenefeld winning 2 and Marlot Meddens winning 0.
The last match between Anna-Lena Groenefeld and Marlot Meddens was at the Alkmaar, 16-06-2008, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Anna-Lena Groenefeld getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Anna-Lena Groenefeld has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Marlot Meddens has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Anna-Lena Groenefeld has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marlot Meddens has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Anna-Lena Groenefeld has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marlot Meddens has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Anna-Lena Groenefeld vs Marlot Meddens Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Groenefeld vs M. Meddens H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

A. Groenefeld	Stats	M. Meddens
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	2
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

A. Groenefeld Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Generali Ladies Linz - Linz - 10-10-2011
Q2 Evgeniya RodinaE. Rodina	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Q1 Kathrin WoerleK. Woerle	W	6-4 3-6 7-6(4)	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 29-08-2011
Q1 Urszula RadwanskaU. Radwanska	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Hechingen - 01-08-2011
R1 Sarah GronertS. Gronert	L	4-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Olomouc - 25-07-2011
R1 Masa Zec-PeskiricM. Zec-Peskiric	W	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

M. Meddens Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wiesbaden - 03-05-2010
R2 Linda BerlineckeL. Berlinecke	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
R1 Felicitas KastnerF. Kastner	W	6-0 6-1	Stats
Bournemouth - 26-04-2010
R2 Romana Caroline TabakR. Caroline	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
R1 Nicola GeorgeN. George	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Hvar - 05-04-2010
R2 Martina CaciottiM. Caciotti	L	2-6 7-5 7-5	Stats

View All

A. Groenefeld vs M. Meddens Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. Groenefeld	Stats	M. Meddens
56.87% (265/201)	YTD Win/Loss	63.01% (92/54)
55.58% (588/470)	Sets Win/Loss	61.96% (202/124)
52.47% (5076/4598)	Games Win/Loss	55.34% (1638/1322)
55.38% (103/83)	Hard Win/Loss	66.67% (6/3)
65.64% (128/67)	Clay Win/Loss	65.12% (84/45)
44.29% (31/39)	Indoor Hard W/L	25.00% (2/6)
20.00% (3/12)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.14	Aces Per Game	0
643	Aces Total	0
0.21	Double Faults Per Game	0
994	Total Double Faults	3
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
501.76	Average Opponent Rank	504.47
56% (6972/12439)	1st Serve %	80% (122/152)
67% (4661/6999)	1st Serve Win %	48% (58/122)
45% (2483/5489)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (13/30)
45% (618/1379)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (10/25)
44% (5557/12549)	Return Points Win %	49% (81/167)
50.91% (28/27)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
50.00% (34/34)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
61.11% (11/7)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
51.24% (103/98)	Main Tour W/L	40.00% (2/3)
70.59% (84/35)	Challenger W/L	34.38% (11/21)
100.00% (5/0)	Futures W/L	72.48% (79/30)
57% (262/460)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	63% (92/145)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
46% (45/97)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	65% (15/23)
55% (71/129)	Deciding Set Win %	49% (17/35)
89% (260/231)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (94/81)
11% (260/29)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (94/13)
17% (206/35)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (52/11)